Comparing the Unique Characters of 1984, Animal Farm and Burmese Days :: compare and contrast essay examples

The Unique Characters of 1984 and Animal Farm and Burmese Days George Orwell, an fictitious name of Eric Arthur Blair, is know for the criminal records 1984 and Animal Farm. In both(prenominal) of these, as well as in most of his others, he seems to delight in using brainy and wholly believable characters, easily believable because of their obvious and tragic faults. another(prenominal) similarity seems to be the consistent use of irony, a stylistic cream which plays big in Burmese Days and in several other works. Also, Blair enjoyed placing his characters in situations and settings that were out-of-the- ordinary, constantly reversing or switching roles. It is a mark of talents that he is able to use all of these so effectively, making us believe the unbelievable and accept the incredible at the same term that he makes us emphasize with the characters and see similarities between them and ourselves, long afterwards they were written. Blairs penchant for extremely well-do ne characters, entirely believable and understandable, is shown by both his major works as well as his lesser cognize first-year fiction piece, Burmese Days. In 1984, the main focus of the invoice is Winston Smith, an Normal Party member living in the year 1984 buy food for his dislike of all that the Party stands for and distrust of its message. Of course, these qualities, questioning of authority and keen disloyalty to unfair persecutors, are considered good by the public today. In the book however, these abilities were destroyed, smothered, and obliterated through careful means, and anyone having them was branded insane, dangerous, and antisocial. Thus, the author creates an immediate seize between us and the suffering main character by screening a little person vs. Big Brother (Blair being the first person to use the word). The Thought Police would get him just the same. He had committed, even if he had never set pen to paper, the essential detestation that contained all others in itself. Thoughtcrime, they called it. Thoughtcrime could not be concealed forever. You might falsify successfully for a while, even for years, but sooner or later they ware bound to get you (Orwell 166). This passage, particularly the final sentence, slowly builds up the readers bond with Winston. He is being persecuted for being innocent, for thinking, and this persecution makes him seem all the much likable. The final, and perhaps most interesting part of Winstons development in 1984 is closely the end of the novel.